Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Liver Int ; 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230814

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To explore the humoral and T-cell response to the third COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). METHODS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were prospectively determined in 81 AIH patients and 53 healthy age- and sex-matched controls >7 days (median 35) after the first COVID-19 booster vaccination. The spike-specific T-cell response was assessed using an activation-induced marker assay (AIM) in a subset of patients. RESULTS: Median antibody levels were significantly lower in AIH compared to controls (10 908 vs. 25 000 AU/ml, p < .001), especially in AIH patients treated with MMF (N = 14, 4542 AU/ml, p = .004) or steroids (N = 27, 7326 AU/ml, p = .020). Also, 48% of AIH patients had antibody titers below the 10% percentile of the healthy controls (9194 AU/ml, p < .001). AIH patients had a high risk of failing to develop a spike-specific T-cell response (15/34 (44%) vs. 2/16 (12%), p = .05) and showed overall lower frequencies of spike-specific CD4 + T cells (median: 0.074% vs 0.283; p = .01) after the booster vaccination compared to healthy individuals. In 34/81 patients, antibody titers before and after booster vaccination were available. In this subgroup, all patients but especially those without detectable/low antibodies titers (<100 AU/ml) after the second vaccination (N = 11/34) showed a strong, 148-fold increase. CONCLUSION: A third COVID-19 vaccination efficiently boosts antibody levels and T-cell responses in AIH patients and even seroconversion in patients with the absent immune response after two vaccinations, but to a lower level compared to controls. Therefore, we suggest routinely assessing antibody levels in AIH patients and offering additional booster vaccinations to those with suboptimal responses.

2.
Semin Cell Dev Biol ; 132: 16-26, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2211427

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) share some features with ubiquitin (Ub) such as their globular 3D structure and the ability to attach covalently to other proteins. Interferon Stimulated Gene 15 (ISG15) is an abundant Ubl that similar to Ub, marks many hundreds of cellular proteins, altering their fate. In contrast to Ub, , ISG15 requires interferon (IFN) induction to conjugate efficiently to other proteins. Moreover, despite the multitude of E3 ligases for Ub-modified targets, a single E3 ligase termed HERC5 (in humans) is responsible for the bulk of ISG15 conjugation. Targets include both viral and cellular proteins spanning an array of cellular compartments and metabolic pathways. So far, no common structural or biochemical feature has been attributed to these diverse substrates, raising questions about how and why they are selected. Conjugation of ISG15 mitigates some viral and bacterial infections and is linked to a lower viral load pointing to the role of ISG15 in the cellular immune response. In an apparent attempt to evade the immune response, some viruses try to interfere with the ISG15 pathway. For example, deconjugation of ISG15 appears to be an approach taken by coronaviruses to interfere with ISG15 conjugates. Specifically, coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, encode papain-like proteases (PL1pro) that bear striking structural and catalytic similarities to the catalytic core domain of eukaryotic deubiquitinating enzymes of the Ubiquitin-Specific Protease (USP) sub-family. The cleavage specificity of these PLpro enzymes is for flexible polypeptides containing a consensus sequence (R/K)LXGG, enabling them to function on two seemingly unrelated categories of substrates: (i) the viral polyprotein 1 (PP1a, PP1ab) and (ii) Ub- or ISG15-conjugates. As a result, PLpro enzymes process the viral polyprotein 1 into an array of functional proteins for viral replication (termed non-structural proteins; NSPs), and it can remove Ub or ISG15 units from conjugates. However, by de-conjugating ISG15, the virus also creates free ISG15, which in turn may affect the immune response in two opposite pathways: free ISG15 negatively regulates IFN signaling in humans by binding non-catalytically to USP18, yet at the same time free ISG15 can be secreted from the cell and induce the IFN pathway of the neighboring cells. A deeper understanding of this protein-modification pathway and the mechanisms of the enzymes that counteract it will bring about effective clinical strategies related to viral and bacterial infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Interferons , Humans , Peptide Hydrolases/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2 , Ubiquitin/metabolism , Antiviral Agents , Polyproteins , Immunity , Cytokines/metabolism , Ubiquitins/genetics , Ubiquitin Thiolesterase
3.
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol ; 78(Pt 9): 1156-1170, 2022 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2018424

ABSTRACT

A remarkable number of SARS-CoV-2 variants and other as yet unmonitored lineages harbor amino-acid substitutions with the potential to modulate the interface between the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) and its receptor ACE2. The naturally occurring Q498Y substitution, which is present in currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, has drawn the attention of several investigations. While computational predictions and in vitro binding studies suggest that Q498Y increases the binding affinity of the spike protein for ACE2, experimental in vivo models of infection have shown that a triple mutant carrying the Q498Y replacement is fatal in mice. To accurately characterize the binding kinetics of the RBD Q498Y-ACE2 interaction, biolayer interferometry analyses were performed. A significant enhancement of the RBD-ACE2 binding affinity relative to a reference SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern carrying three simultaneous replacements was observed. In addition, the RBD Q498Y mutant bound to ACE2 was crystallized. Compared with the structure of its wild-type counterpart, the RBD Q498Y-ACE2 complex reveals the conservation of major hydrogen-bond interactions and a more populated, nonpolar set of contacts mediated by the bulky side chain of Tyr498 that collectively lead to this increase in binding affinity. In summary, these studies contribute to a deeper understanding of the impact of a relevant mutation present in currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants which might lead to stronger host-pathogen interactions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Animals , Binding Sites , Humans , Mice , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/chemistry , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/genetics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , Protein Binding/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/chemistry
4.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 10(3): 319-329, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1739241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this observational study, we explored the humoral and cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and patients with cholestatic autoimmune liver disease (primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] and primary biliary cholangitis [PBC]). METHODS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were determined using the DiaSorin LIAISON and Roche immunoassays in 103 AIH, 64 PSC, and 61 PBC patients and 95 healthy controls >14 days after the second COVID-19 vaccination. The spike-specific T-cell response was assessed using an activation-induced marker assay (AIM) in a subset of individuals. RESULTS: Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was frequently detected in AIH but not in PBC/PSC (10/112 (9%), versus 4/144 (2.7%), p = 0.03). In the remaining patients, seroconversion was measurable in 97% of AIH and 99% of PBC/PSC patients, respectively. However, in 13/94 AIH patients antibody levels were lower than in any healthy control, which contributed to lower antibody levels of the total AIH cohort when compared to PBC/PSC or controls (641 vs. 1020 vs. 1200 BAU/ml, respectively). Notably, antibody levels were comparably low in AIH patients with (n = 85) and without immunosuppression (n = 9). Also, antibody titers significantly declined within 7 months after the second vaccination. In the AIM assay of 20 AIH patients, a spike-specific T-cell response was undetectable in 45% despite a positive serology, while 87% (13/15) of the PBC/PSC demonstrated a spike-specific T-cell response. CONCLUSION: Patients with AIH show an increased SARS-CoV-2 infection rate as well as an impaired B- and T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine compared to PBC and PSC patients, even in the absence of immunosuppression. Thus, antibody responses to vaccination in AIH patients need to be monitored and early booster immunizations considered in low responders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cholangitis, Sclerosing , Cholestasis , Hepatitis, Autoimmune , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Hepatitis, Autoimmune/complications , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL